![bakersfield high speed rail route bakersfield high speed rail route](https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tehachapinews.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/7/da/7dab81d2-b308-11e8-b499-738ef4c1873a/5b9329186abf0.image.jpg)
#BAKERSFIELD HIGH SPEED RAIL ROUTE FULL#
as it is required to acquire right of way (ROW) along the full 119 miles currently under construction in the Central Valley,” wrote Sofia Gutierrez, public information officer for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, in an email to Government Technology.Īll of the high-speed rail projects would use high-tech, non-polluting trains, which, if adopted in a meaningful way by the traveling public, could take a sizable number of cars off the highway and reduce air travel, both of which are large contributors to greenhouse gas emissions.Įditor's note: This story was updated to more accurately reflect the scope and cost of California's high-speed rail project.Imagine getting on your bike in Bakersfield and riding all the way to Merced. “While every project is different, California high-speed rail is unique in the U.S. However, comparing the two may be an exercise fraught with complications, since the two projects involve different factors, like land acquisition, say officials. The Brightline project aims to place the rail line within the Interstate 15 right of way, taking advantage of a corridor that has already been through the acquisition process as well as engineering. This compares with $117 million a mile for the California rail project developed in the Central Valley, connecting Bakersfield to Merced, according to California High-Speed Rail officials. The project planned to connect Los Angeles to Las Vegas is estimated to cost $33 million a mile, said Porritt. In terms of costs, Brightline believes it can build a bullet train cheaper than the California High-Speed Rail project. “That could be a dark side of how this plays out,” he added.
![bakersfield high speed rail route bakersfield high speed rail route](https://www.kget.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/03/high-speed-rail.jpg)
“It’s almost like a Second Amendment issue, and we have to avoid this becoming a politicized argument in the United States.” In L.A., “there are a lot of people who think having their own car, and being able to drive it anywhere, or in an unfettered way, etc., is kind of a God-given right,” Rossant continued. “We’re in an extraordinarily politically polarized moment in this country,” said John Rossant, CEO and founder of CoMotion, speaking on the transportation panel.
![bakersfield high speed rail route bakersfield high speed rail route](https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Bakersfield-train-map.jpg)
The Biden administration just recently restored a $929 million federal grant for the California rail project, which had been pulled by the Trump administration. Many delays and cost increases later, the project has been scaled as a phased development with the first phase covering 171 miles, connecting Bakersfield to Merced, with other segments to follow.Ĭomplicating large-scale public infrastructure projects like these have been political forces, with conservatives often opposing them. The 520-mile project, first approved by voters in 2008, was estimated to cost $45 billion and be operational by 2020. The 236-mile trip could be made in less than 90 minutes, according to Texas Central, significantly shorter than the four hours needed to drive the distance.Īnd of course, perhaps the most high-profile high-speed rail project in the country is currently under construction in California’s Central Valley, an ambitious plan to ultimately connect Los Angeles with San Francisco in 2 hours and 40 minutes. The $20 billion project aims to be fully operational by 2026. Texas Central would connect Dallas with Houston, with a stop near College Station, home to Texas A&M University. It’s not just Brightline planning these rail projects. “And we cannot allow this moment to pass without getting together with the federal government and the private sector and saying, we’ve got to pick corridors that will be successful.” “Our fear for moving forward is that, if we get $60 to $80 billion, and we get no new rail lines in this country, that could effectively be the end of high-speed rail,” he added. Not simply modernizing the rail line that we have today,” said Porritt. “If you were to ask everybody out there today what they expect to come out of this bill when it comes to high-speed rail, they would say, they envision new corridors, new cities that they could travel to, and new routes that they can use. Brightline is advocating the development of new rail lines, expanding service options, in an effort to nudge passengers out of both planes and personal cars. Porritt’s comments come at a time of some of the most robust transportation and infrastructure conversations in a generation, as the Biden administration works to move a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill through Congress, which would include $66 billion for rail.Īlready, however, Amtrak is lobbying for much of this funding to be used for technology upgrades and long overdue maintenance on the country’s only passenger rail network.